Nothing like restarting this blog off with a movie review. And yes, it won’t be good.
I am unsure how to start this. I suppose the best way would be to point at the title and OH GOD I’m still just too angry at this situation. This movie could not have been made any worse. Bewilderingly awful, mind numbingly shallow, hopelessly contrite, further adjectively indescribable in how bad it was. Indeed, I do know the best way to start this, and it is to break it down into all the problems it had.
1) The characters. It did not take a tricorder to detect the lack of depth in any of them. All the dialogue they spewed out was ambiguous, confused, and lackluster to make me think they in any way grew; or even believed in what they were saying. It quite literally was as if they were just reading a script of words that would briefly justify to the audience what they were going to do whatever it was the movie wanted to do next. None of the characters really ever felt interested in what they were doing and none of them came to any fundamental growths in their own outlook on life.
Never was this more apparent than in the main protagonist. What was his purpose? Why would he be possibly driven to destroy entire worlds? Why couldn’t I even tell him apart from his lackeys? It was as if he was just a movie prop, something that had to be in-camera to make the scene complete. Beyond that there was really no real purpose (or even thought) behind his character. He could easily have been replaced by a cardboard cutout and tape recorder and it still would have achieved the same affect.
2) The story (or really lack of one). This movie can be summarised really in one sentence: combine The Phantom Menace with 20,000 leagues under the sea then write it so that an 8 year old can understand it.
This is where we get into a *SPOILER ALERT*. You have been warned.
I suppose if you wanted me to get a little more specific it could be described as this: “Disgruntled and disallusioned cardboard cutout falls through time, and for no adequately explored reason breaks all continuity in the star-trek world while a bunch of random people bounce from plot point to plot point without meaning, focus, drive, or reason.” Everything that was done in the movie wasn’t character driven, it wasn’t story driven, it was script-driven. All things like logic, reason, or motivation took a back seat to just making sure that “plot piece A joins with plot piece B so we can move on to plot piece C”.
Don’t believe me? look at it thus: how could everyone accept time travel so simply and easily? Why did warp drive not actually impose any limits on traveling time but served as just a “next-scene” button? How is it the romulan ship could wipe out an entire fleet yet couldn’t destroy the Kelvin? Why the hell would the cardboard cutout dump Spock on some random planet that Kirk just *happened* to land on next, right next to where he landed?!?!
Just about every scene worked this way, but I think the biggest and best example of this was the showdown argument between Kirk and Spock. Even with what little setting up they did there was no reason at all he’d give up command of the ship when entire planets were at stake. The worst part was he dismissed himself. By the very same arguement if he was going to follow such a strict moral code he would have relieved himself of command when he decided to rescue his parents. The whole thing was just a simple cop-out to swap them as captains halfway through. Really it boiled down to nothing more than the scriptwriters wrote themselves into a corner and as such the story had become too inconvenient to continue in any logical fashion.
3) Camera work/special effects. I’m torn between agitated and nauseated by the work done in the special effects department. Occasionally there were a few good camera shots, and the first once or twice the camera came in from a sideways angle was interesting. But overall the while visual effect production effort was terrible. Every outer space shot was zoomed in far too close to the ship to give any real sense of what was going on. When you panned out even briefly the shot was then filled by a mind numbing amount of red and blue blaster fire or debris. At no point could you ever get a sense of what was really going on in the scene. And far from making it feel tense, stunning, frightening it merely left me overwhelmed with a sense of annoyance and disgust. If I had to sum it all up in a single quote I would merely say “confusion wracked with ambiguitity,and overwhelmed with 10,000 blaster bolts”
And as an additional tip: lens flares do not offer realism, they suggest amateurism. It’s as if you are having trouble understanding how lighting works. Please stop using them.
4) Continuity. I alluded to it briefly above, and I’ll expand upon it here now. This review wouldn’t be complete unless I covered the actual Star Trek aspect of this as well.
Firstly there is the new design of the Enterprise. I’m really not sure how much different they could have made it short of converting the saucer to a triangle and replacing the nacelles with hampster wheels. Abrams’ “vision” not only removed what is well documented and loved and has replaced it with some rediculous hot-rod/steampunk hybrid that bears about as much artistic depth as a 3 year old’s crayon colouring book. What little he managed to draw between the lines was still not enough to justify the extremely bad choices in colour, style, look, and appeal.
He doesn’t stop raping the Star Trek universe there either. Everything, from the phase pistols to warp speed seem to be off. There is no aspect (short of the uniforms, which I admit I quite liked) which was saved from his overwhelming lust to desecrate or overwrite.
And as far as the storyline goes, I’m not even a particularly heavy trek fan and I recognise that what they have done has nullified everything that has come before. Continuity, timelines, backstory (or in this case forestory) of every single episode of all the star-trek series is now wrong. I personally find this a slap in the face of all star-trek fans. Not that I think that canon should be worshiped religiously, but to put this effort in perspective with an example: When the vatican restored the sistine chapel in 1999, I’m sure none of them would have been keen on the idea of tearing out every single fresco and instead replacing the imagery with statues of jesus made out of animal dung and pasta glued to cardboard.
And this is really what he’s done to the trek universe. By wanting to put his own “mark” so badly on it he’s smeared and smudged over almost all the things that made it beautiful and enjoyable to me to begin with. Sure, there were problems with the many of the original shows, but none deserved to have this amount of grime wiped across them.
5) Conclusion
For me the best thing I can hope to do is forget this movie was ever made. And I find it a pity, because it could have been done so much better. It wouldn’t have been hard to do actual dialogue between the characters, to have spent more time actually developing the enterprise, its crew, and its foundations, and actually have made a decent film. Instead this was just a pointless two hour long exposé of JJ Abrams special effects erection, hastily glued together by a pointless story and hastily labeled Star Trek to bring in more moviegoers.